Stronger State-Local Partnerships Needed for Solutions to Housing Crisis

The nation is experiencing a housing crisis on many fronts, from homelessness and poor housing quality to lack of supply and housing disconnected from jobs. This diverse landscape demands that cities and states collaborate and that cities retain a broad set of tools to meet unique local needs. But in many states, the set of tools available to city leaders is limited. Recently, the National League of Cities (NLC), in collaboration with all 49 state municipal leagues, released “Local Tools to Address Housing Affordability: A State-by-State Analysis,” to uncover how states interact with cities on key housing policies and the level of authority they provide to cities to implement proven strategies.

“Every person deserves a safe, affordable place to call home,” said Karen Freeman-Wilson, mayor of Gary, Indiana, and president of the National League of Cities (NLC). “NLC has identified housing as a top priority and is working with local leaders to help residents in every city, town and village have access to quality housing. This research provides local officials with a better picture of the kinds of options and solutions available to cities.”

This new research finds that depending on their state and home rule authority, the ability of cities to improve housing conditions varies extensively across the country. This assessment of all 50 states and the District of Columbia across the five policy areas — inclusionary housing, rent control, housing vouchers, housing trust funds and states tax incentive programs — finds that the District of Columbia, as well as cities in New York and California have more tools to address housing affordability than other cities. Cities in Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Texas and Virginia have fewer. This report is the fifth annual research project developed in collaboration with NLC and state municipal leagues.

Specific findings include:

• Cities in 20 states and the District of Columbia are expressly permitted or face no legal barriers to inclusionary housing
• Cities in 13 states and the District of Columbia are permitted, have some barriers, or have limited control to implement rent control
• Cities in 25 states and the District of Columbia have either state law protections or local protections for those using housing vouchers as a source of income
• Cities in 35 states and the District of Columbia have established housing trust funds
• 19 states and the District of Columbia have state-level tax incentives for new construction and/or rehabilitation of existing low-income housing

You can download the report here.